banks should bear the liability.

jik0s3m82

(Reporter correspondent Liu Feng Tang industry,http://bbs.gemcaa.com/showtopic-1522191.aspx,abercrombie & fitch outlet, following Deng Lihui) Daye a depositor 30,000 deposits held by others in the field impersonator forged passbook, bank depositors should think themselves bear responsibility. The depositor bank to court. Yesterday, Huangshi City Intermediate People's Court final judgment bank full compensation and interest payments.
March 20,peuterey donna,http://www.lighting1680.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=150457, 2007, Jo Daye in a bank opened a personal account, and receive a passbook one. In the same year on July 25, Jo found his account deposits was falsely claimed the 30,http://www.chrisadamsperfumes.com/index.php?item/create_form/1,000 yuan, then alarm. The survey found that Jo deposit system after another steal passwords forged passbook deposits,http://www.mj-mj.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=98585, led away in Fengtai County of Anhui Province. Since then,vetement abercrombie pas cher,http://www.jitabook.com/?action-viewcomment-type-jitapu-itemid-21382, Jo Daye numerous experiences of finding a bank compensation negotiations fail,http://www.kakaland.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=184333,scarpe hogan uomo, then the prosecution to the court requesting an order to pay its bank deposits of $ 30,piumini moncler 2013,000 and loss of principal. Court of First Instance judgment Jo bank deposit losses 30,000 yuan compensation and interest.
The bank refused to accept the appeal to Yellowstone in the hospital, said the case was due to theft caused others,basket air jordan pas cher, the principle should be the first sentence after the people processing. Jo password,moncler sito ufficiale, passbook deposits and other information to improper care is being falsely claimed the main reason for this loss by Jo themselves.
Huangshi City Court held that: Bank advocated the principle untenable after the first sentence the people,scarpe hogan outlet, because Jo request the bank to pay deposits and bank passbook deposits were forged to cheat are two separate legal fact,hogan outlet sito ufficiale, the use of forged bank passbook cheat criminal acts against the bank, rather than a crime against depositors. Meanwhile,moncler outlet, the object is not a real bank to pay depositors. The bank's grounds of appeal can not be established.
The present case,http://www.amarilfranklin.com.br/index.php?option=com_blog&view=blog, even though the presence of Jo password improper care,http://www.smithconsultants.net/one-day-last-september/, but others forged deposit passbook was led away,hogan outlet milano, indicating that banks lack safety measures on the identification of identifying the authenticity of the book. Therefore, banks should bear the liability.
Therefore,abercrombie donna, the Court rejected the bank Yellowstone appeal and upheld the original verdict.